Re: [PULL] pull request for writable limits for 2.6.33-rc0

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Saturday, January 2, 2010 - 2:52 pm

* Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:


I think a "why do we want this badly" blurb would be helpful for next time 
around, to justify the impact to the core kernel:

  48 files changed, 451 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)

And, maybe, if you know about pros/cons of the approach, list them as well. 
The patches looked reasonably clean when i last saw them, and i havent seen 
anyone comment pro or contra - and that's both good and bad: good because 
there's no 'contra' opinion - bad because there's no 'pro' opinion either.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PULL] pull request for writable limits for 2.6.33-rc0, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Jan 2, 2:52 pm)
[PULL] pull request for limits FIXES for 2.6.33-rc, Jiri Slaby, (Mon Jan 4, 3:47 am)
[PATCH 04/11] rlimits: split sys_setrlimit, Jiri Slaby, (Fri May 7, 1:55 am)
[PATCH 07/11] rlimits: add rlimit64 structure, Jiri Slaby, (Fri May 7, 1:55 am)
[PATCH 10/11] rlimits: implement prlimit64 syscall, Jiri Slaby, (Fri May 7, 1:55 am)