Re: [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: =?UTF-8?B?T3phbiDDh2HEn2xheWFu?=
Date: Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 9:30 am

Greg KH wrote:


Yep I know, that's what I'm doing, I just want to make people aware of the problems. I somehow feel a little
bit guilty if I don't report some problems that I've spotted as downstream.

You're totally right, the maintenance of 1 kernel tree would be enough messy and time-consuming, I can't
even think about 3 trees..


Well I thought that .29 would be that lucky one, and .30, and .31. Not something that I
heard from anyone :)


That's nice to hear about that.


No that's not necessary at all. I didn't write that to push you for another release.
I just wanted to share my ideas and got reasonable answers from you.

Thanks again.
Ozan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, Greg KH, (Thu Jan 14, 3:48 pm)
Re: [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, =?UTF-8?B?T3phbiDDh2 ..., (Sat Jan 16, 12:03 pm)
Re: [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, H. Peter Anvin, (Sat Jan 16, 12:07 pm)
Re: [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, Greg KH, (Sat Jan 16, 8:23 pm)
Re: [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, =?UTF-8?B?T3phbiDDh2 ..., (Sun Jan 17, 9:07 am)
Re: [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, Greg KH, (Sun Jan 17, 9:18 am)
Re: [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, =?UTF-8?B?T3phbiDDh2 ..., (Sun Jan 17, 9:30 am)
Re: [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Sun Jan 17, 11:02 am)
Re: [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, Greg KH, (Sun Jan 17, 10:42 pm)
Re: [Stable-review] [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, Nikola Ciprich, (Mon Jan 18, 12:49 am)
Re: [stable] [0/9] 2.6.31.12-stable review, Greg KH, (Tue Jan 19, 4:02 pm)