Re: checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Daniel Walker
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 - 6:11 pm

On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 18:01 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

I don't say "hah!" like I caught you or something .. I could try to
soften the emails further so that's not the feeling .. As far as sending
fixed patches to people it's not really feasible due to the number of
patches I would have to send out.. The other issues is that if I send a
corrected patch I could become responsible for that persons patch
instead of them .. I could send out delta patches, however, I don't want
people to rely on me to fix these issues.. Ideally people would correct
them prior to sending the patches out..

Daniel

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Raistlin, (Tue Sep 22, 3:30 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Claudio Scordino, (Tue Sep 22, 4:58 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Sep 22, 5:38 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Daniel Walker, (Tue Sep 22, 6:24 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Raistlin, (Tue Sep 22, 7:01 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Daniel Walker, (Tue Sep 22, 7:02 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Sep 22, 9:38 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Sep 22, 9:42 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Sep 22, 12:11 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Linus Walleij, (Tue Sep 22, 1:55 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Jonathan Corbet, (Tue Sep 22, 4:39 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Daniel Walker, (Tue Sep 22, 4:55 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Jonathan Corbet, (Tue Sep 22, 5:06 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Daniel Walker, (Tue Sep 22, 5:40 pm)
Re: checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF s ..., Daniel Walker, (Tue Sep 22, 6:11 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Raistlin, (Wed Sep 23, 12:03 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Avi Kivity, (Wed Sep 23, 4:46 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Sep 23, 5:25 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Linus Walleij, (Wed Sep 23, 5:33 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Linus Walleij, (Wed Sep 23, 5:50 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Raistlin, (Wed Sep 23, 6:00 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Claudio Scordino, (Wed Sep 23, 6:22 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Raistlin, (Wed Sep 23, 6:30 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Linus Walleij, (Wed Sep 23, 7:08 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Raistlin, (Wed Sep 23, 7:45 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Daniel Walker, (Wed Sep 23, 7:50 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Avi Kivity, (Wed Sep 23, 7:58 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Daniel Walker, (Wed Sep 23, 8:08 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Avi Kivity, (Wed Sep 23, 8:12 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Daniel Walker, (Wed Sep 23, 8:24 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Steven Rostedt, (Wed Sep 23, 2:39 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, GeunSik Lim, (Wed Sep 23, 5:34 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, GeunSik Lim, (Wed Sep 23, 5:58 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Raistlin, (Wed Sep 23, 11:08 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Claudio Scordino, (Thu Sep 24, 2:11 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Claudio Scordino, (Thu Sep 24, 9:08 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, roel kluin, (Tue Sep 29, 11:15 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Pavel Machek, (Wed Sep 30, 5:05 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class, Raistlin, (Wed Sep 30, 8:59 am)