login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2009
»
August
»
26
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Ric Wheeler
Subject:
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 - 7:41 pm
On 08/25/2009 10:22 PM, Andrei Tanas wrote:
quoted text
>>>> One thing that can happen is when we have a hot spot (like the super >>>> block) on high capacity drives is that the frequent write degrade >> the >>>> data in adjacent tracks. Some drives have firmware that watches for >>>> this and rewrites adjacent tracks, but it is also a good idea to >> avoid >>>> too frequent updates. >>> >>> Yet another detail to worry about.... :-( >> >> it never ends :-) >> >>> >>>> >>>> Didn't you have a tunable to decrease this update frequency? >>> >>> /sys/block/mdX/md/safe_mode_delay >>> is a time in seconds (Default 0.200) between when the last write to >>> the array completes and when the superblock is marked as clean. >>> Depending on the actual rate of writes to the array, the superblock >>> can be updated as much as twice in this time (once to mark dirty, >>> once to mark clean). >>> >>> Increasing the number can decrease the update frequency of the >> superblock, >>> but the exact effect on update frequency is very load-dependant. >>> >>> Obviously a write-intent-bitmap, which is rarely more that a few >>> sectors, can also see lots of updates, and it is harder to tune >>> that (you have to set things up when you create the bitmap). >>> >>> NeilBrown >>> >> >> We did see issues in practice with adjacent sectors with some drives, >> so this >> one is worth tuning down. >> >> I would suggest that Andrei might try to write and clear the IO error >> at that >> offset. You can use Mark Lord's hdparm to clear a specific sector or >> just do the >> math (carefully!) and dd over it. It the write succeeds (without >> bumping your >> remapped sectors count) this is a likely match to this problem, > > I've tried dd multiple times, it always succeeds, and the relocated sector > count is currently 1 on this drive, even though this particular fault > happened at least 3 times so far. >
I would bump that count way up (say to 2) and see if you have an issue... ric --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Andrei Tanas
, (Tue Aug 25, 5:32 pm)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, NeilBrown
, (Tue Aug 25, 5:50 pm)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Ric Wheeler
, (Tue Aug 25, 6:06 pm)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, NeilBrown
, (Tue Aug 25, 6:24 pm)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Ric Wheeler
, (Tue Aug 25, 6:31 pm)
RE: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Andrei Tanas
, (Tue Aug 25, 7:22 pm)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Ric Wheeler
, (Tue Aug 25, 7:41 pm)
RE: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Andrei Tanas
, (Tue Aug 25, 8:45 pm)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Ric Wheeler
, (Wed Aug 26, 3:34 am)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Andrei Tanas
, (Wed Aug 26, 7:46 am)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Andrei Tanas
, (Wed Aug 26, 7:49 am)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Ric Wheeler
, (Wed Aug 26, 8:39 am)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Andrei Tanas
, (Wed Aug 26, 11:12 am)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Mark Lord
, (Wed Aug 26, 5:07 pm)
RE: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Andrei Tanas
, (Wed Aug 26, 6:37 pm)
Re: MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935?
, Robert Hancock
, (Wed Aug 26, 7:33 pm)
MD/RAID time out writing superblock
, Andrei Tanas
, (Thu Aug 27, 2:22 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ken Chen
[patch] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cpu tg->cfs_rq shares.
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH v3] x86: merge the simple bitops and move them to bitops.h
Paul Turner
[tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write
Andi Kleen
Re: - romsignature-checksum-cleanup-2.patch removed from -mm tree
Petr Tesarik
Re: Serious problem with ticket spinlocks on ia64
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: Teach "git checkout" to use git-show-ref
Christian Jaeger
Re: Problem with Git.pm bidi_pipe methods
Linus Torvalds
[PATCH 1/7] Make unpack_trees_options bit flags actual bitfields
Jon Smirl
stgit: managing signed-off-by lines
Han-Wen Nienhuys
Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: Bonito64: Make Loongson independent from Bonito64 code.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
iwlwifi: initialize spinlock before use
Linux Kernel Mailing List
i2c-i801: Add Intel Cougar Point device IDs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drm/i915: Add information on pinning and fencing to the i915 list debug.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ALSA: hda - Clean up quirks for HP laptops with AD1984A
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
v2 [PATCH 1/4] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Richard Cochran
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ptp: Added a clock that uses the eTSEC found on the MPC85xx.
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
[PATCH 40/40] wimax/i2400m: add CREDITS and MAINTAINERS entries
Sathya Perla
[PATCH net-next-2.6] be2net: add multiple RX queue support
Changli Gao
Re: [PATCH 3/3] ifb: move tq from ifb_private
freebsd-current
:
Boris Samorodov
Re: twa + dump = sbwait
韓家標 Bill Hacker
Re: ZFS honesty
Bjoern A. Zeeb
Re: Can not boot 7.0-BETA3 with IPSEC
rmgls
man usb2_core(4)
Sam Leffler
Re: Lots of "ath0: bad series0 hwrate 0x1b" in 8.0-BETA2
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate