Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page allocator

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Larry H.
Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009 - 5:30 am

On 15:16 Sun 31 May     , Pekka Enberg wrote:

I was merely making sure what your intentions were regarding the
patches. And it's clear you have utter disregard for them, and security
as a whole. In your idea of the world 'there are no secrets'.

Good luck with that.


I submitted them so other people could benefit from it. In the end I
could care less about what you do with them, or if they are merged.
Now that is clear that trying to do so is a waste of time and energy,
I'm free to go with a clean conscience, knowing that these patches
didn't help others because I didn't try to, but because some council of
vagueness decided it doesn't fit their particularly flawed view of the
world.

See you in the next commit fixing a kernel vulnerability silently that
puts the infrastructure of several organizations at risk for your own
disregard.

	Larry.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Support for unconditional page sanitization, Larry H., (Sat May 23, 11:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] Support for unconditional page sanitization, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat May 23, 2:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Support for unconditional page sanitization, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun May 24, 9:38 am)
Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level ..., Larry H., (Sun May 31, 5:30 am)