* Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
quoted text > > > > Import Git's nice .txt => {man/html/pdf} generation machinery.
> >
> > The .txt files were already present, so the patch is largely the
> > infrastructure patch. The fixes to .txt files were minimal.
>
> We do not copy Git's .txt => {man/html/pdf} support only to
> support perfcounters.
>
> Either perfcounters use the infrastructure already present or it
> establish a parallel infrastrucutre we can start to migrate over
> to.
>
> In an area where there is so little interest shown as in
> documentation generation we do not want to have two different ways
> to generate man pages, html etc.
>
> IMO the ascii doc support from git is superior to what we have
> today so I am all for replacing the current stuff. But then we
> should do is properly and not as some perfconuter only stuff.
I still think you are misunderstanding it. It is a user-space
tool(-set) with its own needs to install manpages and other
documentation. Look at the code.
Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter tools: Generate p ... , Ingo Molnar , (Sat May 30, 10:23 am)