Where do we stand with the Xen patches?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 12:54 pm

Hi Ingo,

Over the last week or so, I've set out pull requests for the following 
branches in git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git :

for-ingo/xen/dom0/core

    You made two comments about the first post of this set:

       1. The // comments in the mtrr code.  Now fixed.
       2. A query about when Xen can support PAT.  In progress; when its
          done, we can remove the unconditional PAT disable.

for-ingo/xen/dom0/pci
for-ingo/xen/dom0/swiotlb

    Updated with Joerg Roedel, FUJITA Tomonori and Matthew Wilcox's
    comments,  Acked-by and Reviewed-bys as appropriate.

for-ingo/xen/dom0/apic-ops

    After discussion between yourself and HPA, we resolved that using
    io_apic_ops was the right way to go forward with this.  I replaced
    for-ingo/xen/dom0/apic with the new branch
    for-ingo/xen/dom0/apic-ops, which is identical aside from
    implementing and using io_apic_ops.

for-ingo/xen/dom0/mtrr

    You queried the value of "extending" this interface, given that its
    considered to be deprecated.  These changes in no way extend the
    interface, but just make the existing interface functional under
    Xen.  And while we don't have PAT support, there's no other way of
    setting cachability attributes on memory, so not supporting it has a
    fairly severe performance impact on things like X.


Aside from some whitespace issues around some Impact: lines, I don't 
know of any outstanding problems.  (I just pushed an updates to these 
branches to fix those, and fold a change to address Jesse's comment.)

Please tell me if you have any further issues which prevents you from 
pulling these changes.  Otherwise I'd appreciate it if you pulled them 
soon, as we're already on -rc5, and I have more changes I'd like to prep 
for the next merge window.

Thanks,
    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu May 14, 12:54 pm)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ingo Molnar, (Fri May 15, 11:35 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri May 15, 12:59 pm)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori, (Sun May 17, 6:36 pm)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun May 17, 6:42 pm)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ingo Molnar, (Mon May 18, 1:40 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon May 18, 10:27 pm)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 19, 6:03 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue May 19, 8:30 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell, (Tue May 19, 8:56 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed May 20, 10:06 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu May 21, 1:54 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell, (Thu May 21, 3:27 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell, (Thu May 21, 3:28 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu May 21, 3:39 am)
Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell, (Thu May 21, 3:48 am)
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu May 21, 4:19 am)
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu May 21, 10:21 am)