On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:57:23AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted text
> 
> Here's a simple patch that does that. Not even tested, it compiles. Note
> that file systems that currently do blkdev_issue_flush() in their
> ->sync() should then get it removed.
> 

That's going to be a mess.  Ext3 implements an fsync() by requesting a
journal commit, and then waiting for the commit to have taken place.
The commit happens in another thread, kjournald.  Knowing when it's OK
not to do a blkdev_issue_flush() because the commit was triggered by
an fsync() is going to be really messy.  Could we at least have a flag
in struct super which says, "We'll handle the flush correctly, please
don't try to do it for us?"

						- Ted

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/