Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted text > Ric Wheeler wrote:
> What do you think sync_blockdev() does? What is its purpose?
quoted text > Twofold:
> (1) guarantee all user data is flushed out before a major event
> (unmount, journal close, unplug, poweroff, explosion, ...)
quoted text > (2) As a sledgehammer hack for simple or legacy filesystems that do not
> wish or need the complexity of transactional protection. sync_blockdev()
> is intentionally used in lieu of complexity for the following
> filesystems: HFS, HFS+, ADFS, AFFS, FAT, bfs, UFS, NTFS, qnx4.
quoted text > My patch adds needed guarantees, only for the above filesystems, where
> none were present before.
To be specific, I was referring to fsync(2) guarantees being added to
HFS, HFS+, ADFS, AFFS, FAT, bfs, UFS, NTFS, and qnx4.
Other filesystems, besides those in the list, gain the flush-on-unmount
action (a rare but useful addition) with my patch.
Jeff
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] issue storage device flush via sync_blockdev() ... , Jeff Garzik , (Wed Mar 25, 6:33 pm)