login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2009
»
February
»
13
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Subject:
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?
Date: Friday, February 13, 2009 - 2:23 am
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
quoted text
> Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I dont think that proc_mkdir conventions have changed > > recently. According to git blame fs/proc/generic.c: > > > > ^1da177e (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 580) ent = > > kmalloc(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) + len + 1, GFP_KERNEL); > > > > > > I think its new that request_irq ends up calling proc_mkdir though. But its > moot now anyway; I cleaned up that code, and don't call request_irq under > spinlock any more.
Just checked. The register_irq_proc() and register_handler_proc() calls in request/setup_irq() have the same time stamp in git :) Thanks, tglx --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Can request_irq be called under spinlock?
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Thu Feb 12, 1:08 pm)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Thu Feb 12, 3:28 pm)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Thu Feb 12, 4:35 pm)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?
, Johannes Weiner
, (Thu Feb 12, 8:38 pm)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Fri Feb 13, 2:23 am)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Feb 13, 2:52 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Trent Waddington
Re: Gaming Interface
Pekka Enberg
Re: latest -git: suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request (was Re: no_conso...
Dan Carpenter
Re: [patch] dma-debug: off by one issue
Adrian McMenamin
time_after - what on earth???
Paul E. McKenney
Re: [PATCH, RFC] v4 scalable classic RCU implementation
git
:
Stephen R. van den Berg
Re: [RFC] origin link for cherry-pick and revert
Christian Stimming
git-gui: Fix broken revert confirmation.
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-svnimport
Mark Burton
Re: [PATCH] builtin-branch: highlight current remote branches with an asterisk
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Fix approxidate("never") to always return 0
linux-netdev
:
Nick Piggin
Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330 __netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()
Daniel Lezcano
getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change
David Miller
Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a seco...
Ingo Molnar
Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 37/37] dccp: Debugging functions for feature negotiation
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ath9k_htc: Allocate URBs properly
Linux Kernel Mailing List
cpumask: make irq_set_affinity() take a const struct cpumask
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: 5670/1: bcmring: add default configuration for bcmring arch
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ahci: Workaround HW bug for SB600/700 SATA controller PMP support
Linux Kernel Mailing List
i7core_edac: Probe on Xeons eariler
openbsd-misc
:
Christophe Rioux
Implementation example of snmp
Ryan McBride
Re: Packets Per Second Limit?
Nick Holland
Re: booting openbsd on eee without cd-rom
Bryan Irvine
Re: OpenBSD 4.7 Released, May 19 2010
Marco Peereboom
Re: Singularity OS
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate