Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009 - 3:28 pm

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

I dont think that proc_mkdir conventions have changed
recently. According to git blame fs/proc/generic.c:

^1da177e (Linus Torvalds     2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 580)     ent = kmalloc(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) + len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);

Thanks,

	tglx
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Can request_irq be called under spinlock?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Feb 12, 1:08 pm)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Feb 12, 3:28 pm)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Feb 12, 4:35 pm)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?, Johannes Weiner, (Thu Feb 12, 8:38 pm)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Feb 13, 2:23 am)
Re: Can request_irq be called under spinlock?, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Feb 13, 2:52 am)