On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 19:28 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
Importance of any particular requirement is relative/subjective. As is
usefulness of any existing functionality.
Personally, I just think it's cool to pick up a random remote and use
Linux to figure out its protocol and its codes and get it working.
Nope. That other OS provider forces device obsolescence or arbitrary
constraints on users quite often and I don't like it myself. That's why
I use Linux.
The old remote in my possession costs $0, and I don't even have to leave
the house.
The design should serve the users, the users should not serve the
design. If the reduction of requirements scope starts forcing users to
buy new hardware, are we really serving the users or just asking them to
pay to compensate for our shortcomings?
Regards,
Andy
--