On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 21:48 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
quoted text
> Hi!
> 
> > >> > Switch smd code to the version in staging. Something to apply to
> > >> > dream/ tree I'd say... and yes, it still works.
> > >>
> > >> I think we might want to consider leaving at least the core smd code
> > >> under mach-msm.
> > >
> > > In the long run, I agree.
> > >
> > > In the short run... the code is staging quality, so it should be in
> > > staging... and you'll not have to mainain so huge diff. (-20 kLoc).
> > 
> > The core smd stuff is really not that large.  The central smd.[ch] are
> > about 1300 lines, and proc_comm.[ch] are about 400 lines.  Is it
> > possible to get some review/feedback as to what's "staging quality"
> > about this code so we can clean it up?  I'd rather just fix the
> > issues
> 
> Just submit it to Daniel W., ccing rmk and l-a-k, and I'm sure you'll
> get feedback.

I have it in my tree already .. My tree has some duplication over
staging, for instance the rpc code is mostly in my tree, as is the smd
code.

Daniel

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/