On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 13:13 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
quoted text
> > It's not laziness, it's consistency.  How is actual different than free 
> > memory or any other stat?
> 
> Because it's a COLLECTION of stats.  For example, swap in should be < swap
> out.  Now, the current Linux implementation of all_vm_events() is non-atomic
> anyway, so maybe we can just document this as best-effort.  I'm saying that
> if it *is* a problem, I think we need a vq.

I can't see why we would care about the atomicity of the collection of
statistics.  Best-effort is good enough.  Any variance within the stats
will be overshadowed by the latency of the host-side management daemon.

quoted text
> But it raises the question: what stats are generally useful cross-OS?  Should
> we be supplying numbers like "unused" (free) "instantly discardable" (ie.
> clean), "discardable to disk" (ie. file-backed), "discardable to swap"
> (ie. swap-backed) and "unswappable" instead?

While I see the virtue in presenting abstracted memory stats that seem
more digestible in a virtualization context, I think we should keep the
raw stats.  This concentrates the complexity in the host-side management
daemon, and allows the host daemon to make better decisions (ie. by
reacting to trends in individual statistics).  Different OSes (or
different versions of the same OS), may also have different sets of
statistics that will provide the answers that a management daemon needs.


-- 
Thanks,
Adam

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/