Re: 2.6.32-rc3: low mem - only 378MB on x86_32 with 64GB. Why?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Byron Stanoszek
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009 - 11:42 am

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Jeff Chua wrote:


I have some installations using a 64-bit kernel and a 32-bit OS (including
Oracle). This setup works really well and lets you use all available memory.
You don't even have to upgrade your OS; just swap out the kernel.

  -Byron

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: 2.6.32-rc3: low mem - only 378MB on x86_32 with 64GB. Why?, Byron Stanoszek, (Mon Oct 5, 11:42 am)
Re: 2.6.32-rc3: low mem - only 378MB on x86_32 with 64GB. Why?, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Sat Oct 10, 11:10 am)
Re: 2.6.32-rc3: low mem - only 378MB on x86_32 with 64GB. Why?, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sun Oct 11, 2:06 am)
Re: 2.6.32-rc3: low mem - only 378MB on x86_32 with 64GB. Why?, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sun Oct 11, 2:08 am)