Daniel Walker a écrit :
quoted text > [...]
> It's your defect, so you can still try to fix it (unless the "xen
> people" or someone else beats you to it.)
>
> It looks like on a normal system dmi_scan_machine() gets called very
> early in setup_arch() arch/x86/kernel/setup.c . A possible good fix
> might be to add a dmi_disable() into the dmi driver that just shuts off
> dmi, and run that in xen_arch_setup() in arch/x86/xen/setup.c
Could it make sense having this patch (I can work on it) while keeping
my previous patch ?
Does it make sense keeping the default return value I've been adding
when no dmi table is found ?
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] dmi_check_system can generate Warnings when no ... , Erwan Velu , (Fri Oct 23, 8:03 am)
