Re: [Openipmi-developer] [Discuss] [PATCH] ipmi: use round_jiffies on timers to reduce timer overhead/wakeups

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Corey Minyard
Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 - 1:02 pm

Bela Lubkin wrote:
This is an industry where pennies matter, apparently.

My personal preference would be to use the I2C based standard 
interface.  That actually doesn't perform too badly, it's probably 
cheaper than KCS since you already have I2C, anyway, and the I2C 
interfaces are generally tied to an interrupt.  The trouble is that the 
only hardware implementation of this I know of seems to be poorly done, 
but that mostly affects trying to use the ethernet interface and the 
local interface at the same time.

Of course, the driver for I2C is not yet in the standard kernel as it 
requires a fairly massive I2C driver rewrite to allow the IPMI driver to 
do it's panic-time operations.

BT would be better for performance, I guess, but it's yet another 
interface to tie in, and hanging this off an existing bus seems like a 
sensible thing to do.  And performance is really not an issue for IPMI.

-corey
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] ipmi: use round_jiffies on timers to reduce ti ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Oct 21, 11:42 am)
Re: [Openipmi-developer] [Discuss] [PATCH] ipmi: use round ..., Corey Minyard, (Thu Oct 22, 1:02 pm)