> [cc'ing Jean and quoting whole body]
>
> Hello, Jean.
>
> It seems i2c_i801 is triggering IRQ storm on Alexander's machine. The
> original thread is
>
>
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/894187
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alexander Huemer wrote:
>
>> Alexander Huemer wrote:
>>
>>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alexander Huemer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday 12 October 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alexander, can you please attach full boot log and the output of
>>>>>>>> "lspci -nn"? Also, how reproducible is the problem? You already
>>>>>>>> answered to Frans' question but can you be more specific?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Full dmesg was made available earlier at:
>>>>>>>
http://xx.vu/~ahuemer/dmesg_ahuemer_20090923
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does blacklisting i801_smbus make any difference?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> lspci -nn:
>>>>>
http://xx.vu/~ahuemer/lspci_nn_ahuemer_20091012
>>>>>
>>>>> what do you mean with "blacklisting i801_smbus" ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> [ 3.872387] i2c /dev entries driver
>>>> [ 3.873943] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT B -> GSI 23 (level,
>>>> low) -> IRQ 23
>>>> [ 3.875580] w83627hf: Found W83627HF chip at 0x290
>>>>
>>>> IRQ23 is also used by i801_smbus and it would be nice to confirm
>>>> whether the problem can still be triggered with that driver not
>>>> loaded. Adding "blacklist i2c_i801" to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
>>>> should probabaly do the trick.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> okay, i think you assume that i2c_i801 is a module.
>>> it is indeed built into the kernel.
>>> i'll rebuild the kernel without that component and run a test again.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> -alex
>>>
>> tejun, it seems you hit an interesting point.
>> i compiled kernel-2.6.31.3 with my ususal config _without_ i2c_i801.
>> my usual test (compilation of gcc-4.3.2) finished 5 times without the
>> error.
>> i'll let it run some more times over night.
>> does anybody have an idea how i can trace what exactly causes the error
>> during the compilation run so that i can create a short test program ?
>>
>> regards
>> -alex
>>
>
>