Re: "eliminate warn_on_slowpath()" change causes many gcc-3.2.3 warnings

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Saturday, January 17, 2009 - 1:01 pm

Ingo Molnar wrote:

Why should it?  I don't think a NULL pointer as the format to a
printf-style function is well defined.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: "eliminate warn_on_slowpath()" change causes many gcc- ..., H. Peter Anvin, (Sat Jan 17, 1:01 pm)