I observed this locking violation [1] while gnome-panel was loading; this was previously reported at http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0806.3/2881.html . Let me know for more information/config/testing. Thanks! Daniel --- [1] ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.27-rc5-233c-debug #2 ------------------------------------------------------- gnome-panel/4944 is trying to acquire lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<ffffffff806aa40f>] do_page_fault+0x12f/0xae0 but task is already holding lock: (&dev->ev_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80320ac3>] inotify_read+0xe3/0x200 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&dev->ev_mutex){--..}: [<ffffffff80271889>] __lock_acquire+0xd49/0x1190 [<ffffffff80271d61>] lock_acquire+0x91/0xc0 [<ffffffff806a5069>] __mutex_lock_common+0xb9/0x430 [<ffffffff806a54bf>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff80321216>] inotify_dev_queue_event+0x46/0x1c0 [<ffffffff803200e6>] inotify_inode_queue_event+0xc6/0x110 [<ffffffff802f424c>] fsnotify_create+0x3c/0x70 [<ffffffff802f4c5d>] vfs_create+0xbd/0xd0 [<ffffffff802f7dfe>] do_filp_open+0x80e/0x910 [<ffffffff802e82b0>] do_sys_open+0x80/0x110 [<ffffffff802e8380>] sys_open+0x20/0x30 [<ffffffff8020c86b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff -> #2 (&ih->mutex){--..}: [<ffffffff80271889>] __lock_acquire+0xd49/0x1190 [<ffffffff80271d61>] lock_acquire+0x91/0xc0 [<ffffffff806a5069>] __mutex_lock_common+0xb9/0x430 [<ffffffff806a54bf>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff8031fe73>] inotify_find_update_watch+0x53/0xe0 [<ffffffff80320d85>] sys_inotify_add_watch+0x115/0x1d0 [<ffffffff8020c86b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff -> #1 (&inode->inotify_mutex){--..}: [<ffffffff80271889>] __lock_acquire+0xd49/0x1190 [<ffffffff80271d61>] lock_acquire+0x91/0xc0 [<ffffffff806a5069>] __mutex_lock_common+0xb9/0x430 [<ffffffff806a54bf>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff80320070>] inotify_inode_queue_event+0x50/0x110 [<ffffffff803206e1>] inotify_dentry_parent_queue_event+0x91/0xb0 [<ffffffff802ebb7f>] __fput+0x7f/0x1f0 [<ffffffff802ebd15>] fput+0x25/0x30 [<ffffffff802c84ff>] remove_vma+0x4f/0x90 [<ffffffff802ca359>] do_munmap+0x2e9/0x330 [<ffffffff802ca3f5>] sys_munmap+0x55/0x80 [<ffffffff8020c86b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){----}: [<ffffffff80271950>] __lock_acquire+0xe10/0x1190 [<ffffffff80271d61>] lock_acquire+0x91/0xc0 [<ffffffff806a56eb>] down_read+0x4b/0x80 [<ffffffff806aa40f>] do_page_fault+0x12f/0xae0 [<ffffffff806a7bdd>] error_exit+0x0/0xa9 [<ffffffff802eac08>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170 [<ffffffff802eadb5>] sys_read+0x55/0x90 [<ffffffff8020c86b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by gnome-panel/4944: #0: (&dev->ev_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80320ac3>] inotify_read+0xe3/0x200 stack backtrace: Pid: 4944, comm: gnome-panel Not tainted 2.6.27-rc5-233c-debug #2 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8026f807>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xa7/0xf0 [<ffffffff80271950>] __lock_acquire+0xe10/0x1190 [<ffffffff80271d61>] lock_acquire+0x91/0xc0 [<ffffffff806aa40f>] ? do_page_fault+0x12f/0xae0 [<ffffffff806a56eb>] down_read+0x4b/0x80 [<ffffffff806aa40f>] ? do_page_fault+0x12f/0xae0 [<ffffffff8025c51a>] ? search_exception_tables+0x2a/0x50 [<ffffffff806aa40f>] do_page_fault+0x12f/0xae0 [<ffffffff8026d951>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x21/0xc0 [<ffffffff80213fc0>] ? native_sched_clock+0x90/0xb0 [<ffffffff80270e39>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2f9/0x1190 [<ffffffff80270606>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0xa0 [<ffffffff802708bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff80270849>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x149/0x1b0 [<ffffffff806a7bdd>] error_exit+0x0/0xa9 [<ffffffff80459acd>] ? copy_user_generic_string+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffff80320b5d>] ? inotify_read+0x17d/0x200 [<ffffffff8025ee00>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 [<ffffffff802708bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff802eac08>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170 [<ffffffff802eadb5>] sys_read+0x55/0x90 [<ffffffff8020c86b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b -- Daniel J Blueman --
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
| FUJITA Tomonori | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| James Morris | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
