Re: [PATCH] Xen: Fix pte unpin BUG when !CONFIG_SMP

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alex Nixon
Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 - 12:21 pm

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Here's the backtrace of the BUG() the patch addresses.  Now you've 
pointed it out - I see the asymmetry - and also suspect some ptes are 
being left pinned.

I'm having trouble finding a cleaner solution which solves this but 
doesn't incite more BUGs. 

Perhaps you have an idea?

- Alex


------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at 
/local/scratch/hotplug.linux.trees.git/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:847!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
Modules linked in:

Pid: 1, comm: init Tainted: G        W (2.6.27-rc5-tip #352)
EIP: 0061:[<c10038fe>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 0
EIP is at pin_pagetable_pfn+0x3f/0x4b
EAX: ffffffea EBX: df82bd7c ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000000
ESI: 00007ff0 EDI: c1a579e0 EBP: df82bd94 ESP: df82bd7c
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: e021
Process init (pid: 1, ti=df82a000 task=df82c000 task.ti=df82a000)
Stack: 00000004 0014a0a1 00000000 0001fb4f c1a579e0 c1a579e0 df82bda4 
c1003dd3
       003f69e0 c157e024 df82bdac c1003e0e df82bdc8 c101b577 00000000 
00000000
       003f69e0 c1661000 dfb4e000 df82be28 c1062d35 1fb4f067 00000000 
dfb4e000
Call Trace:
 [<c1003dd3>] ? xen_release_ptpage+0x61/0x80
 [<c1003e0e>] ? xen_release_pte+0xd/0xf
 [<c101b577>] ? __pte_free_tlb+0x46/0x5f
 [<c1062d35>] ? free_pgd_range+0x1dc/0x391
 [<c10794e5>] ? setup_arg_pages+0x1b8/0x22b
 [<c109b3cb>] ? load_elf_binary+0x3f1/0x10c6
 [<c1062206>] ? get_user_pages+0x316/0x394
 [<c1078bef>] ? get_arg_page+0x2c/0x7e
 [<c1078bc1>] ? put_arg_page+0x8/0xa
 [<c1078d97>] ? copy_strings+0x156/0x160
 [<c1078e51>] ? search_binary_handler+0x7b/0x1c0
 [<c1079e20>] ? do_execve+0x13a/0x1c4
 [<c1007164>] ? sys_execve+0x29/0x4b
 [<c1008a2e>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 [<c100b11f>] ? kernel_execve+0x17/0x1c
 [<c1003140>] ? run_init_process+0x17/0x19
 [<c10031e8>] ? init_post+0xa6/0xf6
 [<c100965f>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
 =======================

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Xen: Fix pte unpin BUG when !CONFIG_SMP, Alex Nixon, (Tue Sep 9, 4:25 am)
Re: [PATCH] Xen: Fix pte unpin BUG when !CONFIG_SMP, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Sep 9, 4:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] Xen: Fix pte unpin BUG when !CONFIG_SMP, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Sep 9, 11:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] Xen: Fix pte unpin BUG when !CONFIG_SMP, Alex Nixon, (Tue Sep 9, 12:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Xen: Fix pte unpin BUG when !CONFIG_SMP, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Sep 9, 1:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Xen: Fix pte unpin BUG when !CONFIG_SMP, Alex Nixon, (Tue Sep 9, 3:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Xen: Fix pte unpin BUG when !CONFIG_SMP, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Sep 9, 3:28 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] mm: define USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS rather than repea ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Sep 9, 3:43 pm)
[PATCH 2/2] xen: fix pinning when not using split pte locks, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Sep 9, 3:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen: fix pinning when not using split pte ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Sep 9, 4:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen: fix pinning when not using split pte ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Sep 9, 4:32 pm)