On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 04:00:27AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
quoted text
> We no longer need to manage our version of hotplug_slot->name
> since the PCI and hotplug core manage it on our behalf.
> 
> Now, we simply advise the PCI core of the name that we would
> like, and let the core take care of the rest.

quoted text
> -static void
> -make_slot_name(struct slot *slot)
> -{
> -	snprintf(slot->hotplug_slot->name,
> -		 SLOT_NAME_SIZE, "%02x:%02x", slot->bus->number, slot->number);
> -}
>  
>  
> +		scnprintf(name, SLOT_NAME_SIZE, "%02x:%02x", bus->number, i);
> +
>  		hotplug_slot->private = slot;

Unfortunately, our name is kind of crappy.  Can we not give the user
anything better than this?  I can't seem to find the CompactPCI
specification to see if we have a better name available.

I wonder if we can use DMI data on this class of machine.  Scott?

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/