Re: mmotm 2008-09-08-18-32 uploaded

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 - 6:25 am

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:35:16 -0700
akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:


I'll dig if I have time. This is just a report.

I tries UnixBench4.1 on x86_64/2cpu/1socket machine. (memory cgroup is enabled)

Following is comparison with a mmtom based on rc4.
===
[rc4mm1]
Execl Throughput                           3004.4 lps   (29.6 secs, 3 samples)
C Compiler Throughput                      1017.9 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)               5726.3 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)               1124.3 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)               576.0 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places         125446.5 lpm   (30.0 secs, 3 samples)

[rc5mm1]
Execl Throughput                           3006.5 lps   (29.8 secs, 3 samples)
C Compiler Throughput                      1006.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)               4863.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                943.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)               482.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places         124804.9 lpm   (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
==
15% down in shell script test. Any idea ? (scheduler ?)

Thanks,
-Kame

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: mmotm 2008-09-08-18-32 uploaded, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Sep 9, 6:25 am)
Re: mmotm 2008-09-08-18-32 uploaded, Andrew Morton, (Tue Sep 9, 1:37 pm)
Re: mmotm 2008-09-08-18-32 uploaded, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Sep 9, 9:01 pm)
Re: mmotm 2008-09-08-18-32 uploaded, Andrew Morton, (Tue Sep 9, 9:46 pm)