%llx and the like cannot be used on u64-derived data types - they must be cast to long long explicitly for arch-es where u64 is a typedef of unsigned long (ia64 is where I observed the problem). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> --- drivers/pci/probe.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.27-rc5/drivers/pci/probe.c 2008-08-21 14:37:32.000000000 +0200 +++ 2.6.27-rc5-pci-probe-print/drivers/pci/probe.c 2008-09-02 15:18:08.000000000 +0200 @@ -383,7 +383,10 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(str res->start = base; if (!res->end) res->end = limit + 0xfff; - printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: bridge %s io port: [%llx, %llx]\n", pci_name(dev), res->start, res->end); + printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: bridge %s io port: [%Lx, %Lx]\n", + pci_name(dev), + (unsigned long long)res->start, + (unsigned long long)res->end); } res = child->resource[1]; @@ -395,7 +398,10 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(str res->flags = (mem_base_lo & PCI_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_MASK) | IORESOURCE_MEM; res->start = base; res->end = limit + 0xfffff; - printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: bridge %s 32bit mmio: [%llx, %llx]\n", pci_name(dev), res->start, res->end); + printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: bridge %s 32bit mmio: [%Lx, %Lx]\n", + pci_name(dev), + (unsigned long long)res->start, + (unsigned long long)res->end); } res = child->resource[2]; @@ -431,7 +437,11 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(str res->flags = (mem_base_lo & PCI_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_MASK) | IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH; res->start = base; res->end = limit + 0xfffff; - printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: bridge %s %sbit mmio pref: [%llx, %llx]\n", pci_name(dev), (res->flags & PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64)?"64":"32",res->start, res->end); + printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: bridge %s %dbit mmio pref: [%Lx, %Lx]\n", + pci_name(dev), + res->flags & PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 ? ...
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:06:24 +0100 These have been fixed in linux-next for a month. Jesse, can we get that into 2.6.27 please? --
I suppose. They only appear with certain configs and are fairly harmless, so I wasn't planning on pushing them into 2.6.27. But I'll include it in my next pull request anyway, since you're such a cool guy and I want to make you happy :) (assuming 2.6.27 proper isn't released in the next couple of day...) Thanks, Jesse --
Why did you replace `%ll' by `%L'?
While `L' is used as an internal flag in Linux' vsnprintf() implementation and
is still supported because of historical (pre-C99) reasons, the `L' conversion
qualifier is meant for the `long double' floating point type, as per C99.
The recommended conversion qualifier for the `long long' integer type is `ll'.
Perhaps checkpatch should check for this? Ah, it already does for some of the
integer formats. The patch below adds checks for the missing ones.
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: Check for %L for all integer formats
Checkpatch checks for the use of the non-standard `L' conversion qualifier for
some (`u', `d', and `i') of the 6 integers formats. Add the missing ones
(`o', `x', and `X'), and keep the list sorted.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index bc67793..92cbf5e 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2277,12 +2277,12 @@ sub process {
WARN("usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc\n" . $herecurr);
}
-# check for %L{u,d,i} in strings
+# check for %L{d,i,o,u,x,X} in strings
my $string;
while ($line =~ /(?:^|")([X\t]*)(?:"|$)/g) {
$string = substr($rawline, $-[1], $+[1] - $-[1]);
- if ($string =~ /(?<!%)%L[udi]/) {
- WARN("\%Ld/%Lu are not-standard C, use %lld/%llu\n" . $herecurr);
+ if ($string =~ /(?<!%)%L[diouxX]/) {
+ WARN("\%L[diouxX] are not-standard C, use %ll[diouxX]\n" . $herecurr);
last;
}
}
With kind regards,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Software Architect
Sony Techsoft Centre Europe
The Corporate Village [...] Yes that looks entirly reasonable to me. Will queue it up with my next batch for Andrew. Thanks. -apw --
I understand all of this, but can't see why you would care about floating point formats in the kernel (when specifically you know that vsnprintf() & Co aren't able to handle it anyway). So I think rather than widening the set of specifiers checkpatch looks for, the check should rather be removed altogether. Jan --
