Re: [RFC 11/13] genapic: reduce stack pressuge in io_apic.c step 3 target_cpus

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mike Travis
Date: Monday, September 8, 2008 - 8:01 am

Ingo Molnar wrote:

As I did that one first, I didn't want to muddle through too much i386 code,
but when I did the vector_allocation_domain, it became more clear that making
them common would be better.

I also tripped myself up because one of my test i386 configs had 64 cpus and
it fired up the "NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LON" code. ;-)  [And I'm supposing it's
probably justified to believe that there may be "fairly large" 32-bit systems,
for those applications that need horsepower but not a lot of memory.]

Thanks,
Mike
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC 11/13] genapic: reduce stack pressuge in io_apic. ..., Mike Travis, (Mon Sep 8, 8:01 am)