Oh, you mean te "--expect" in the last pit_expect_msb(). Yeah, that one
looks bogus, but I don't understand what it has to do with gcc at all.
"expect" is an unsigned char. There are absolutely _zero_ issues with
overflow, underflow, random phases of the moon, madness levels or anything
else. But yes, it does look like Ingo screwed up when adding that final
check, since expect was already decremented at the end of the loop.
Ingo? Did you actually test it?
Linus
--