login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
September
»
6
Re: [git pull] x86 fixes (NOPL issue)
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Yinghai Lu
Subject:
Re: [git pull] x86 fixes (NOPL issue)
Date: Friday, September 5, 2008 - 8:01 pm
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Linus, > > Please pull: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git x86-fixes-for-linus-2 > > H. Peter Anvin (4): > x86: boot: stub out unimplemented CPU feature words
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
quoted text
> index 80ab20d..0785b3c 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > #include <asm/mtrr.h> > #include <asm/mce.h> > #include <asm/pat.h> > +#include <asm/asm.h> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC > #include <asm/mpspec.h> > #include <asm/apic.h> > @@ -341,6 +342,35 @@ static void __init early_cpu_detect(void) > early_get_cap(c); > } > > +/* > + * The NOPL instruction is supposed to exist on all CPUs with > + * family >= 6, unfortunately, that's not true in practice because > + * of early VIA chips and (more importantly) broken virtualizers that > + * are not easy to detect. Hence, probe for it based on first > + * principles. > + */
if so, should only test on VIA chips. YH --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[git pull] x86 fixes (NOPL issue)
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Fri Sep 5, 7:22 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 fixes (NOPL issue)
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Sep 5, 8:01 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 fixes (NOPL issue)
, David Sanders
, (Mon Sep 8, 8:02 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Mathieu Desnoyers
[PATCH 01/10] local_t : architecture independant extension
Ingo Molnar
Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
monstr
[PATCH 46/56] microblaze_v2: headers files entry.h current.h mman.h registers.h se...
alan
Re: Versioning file system
Jan Engelhardt
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
git
:
Andy Parkins
git-fetch fails with error code 128
Johannes Sixt
Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command
Yakov Lerner
Re: Autoconf/Automake
Miklos Vajna
Re: [IRC/patches] Failed octopus merge does not clean up
Johannes Sixt
Re: [msysGit] [PATCH 01/12] Fake reencoding success under NO_ICONV instead of retu...
linux-netdev
:
jamal
[net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/7] xfrm: introduce basic mark infrastructure
jamal
[net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/7] xfrm by MARK
Timo Teräs
ip xfrm policy semantics
Jeff Garzik
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sky2: phy setup changes
Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA
Re: [PATCH] don't touch bridge sysfs in container.
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, msr: Export the register-setting MSR functions via /dev/*/msr
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: SMTC: Fix lockup in smtc_distribute_timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (13840): smsusb: Add ISDB-T firmware for Hauppauge WinTV-Nova-T-MiniStick
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: gpio-keys - add support for disabling gpios through sysfs
openbsd-misc
:
Marco Peereboom
Re: Defending OpenBSD Performance
elitdostlar
Seks partneri arayan bayanlar bu adreste - 8878xs706x6438
Damon Schultz
Routing iTunes sharing across subnets using OpenBSD
Ashraf Cotu
Je sur comptable a la banque BCB je vais virée $6.million a la etranger
Chris Black
Re: carp, 2 router
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate