Re: Is SKAS still required for UML

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: greg
Date: Friday, September 5, 2008 - 6:36 am

On Aug 27,  3:06pm, Jeff Dike wrote:
} Subject: Re: Is SKAS still required for UML

Hi Jeff, hope the week is ending well for you.



Any thoughts or timetable on SKAS4 going mainline?  I suspect the
SKAS3 patches are even remotely compatible with current mainline
kernels.

We've had good success with SKAS4 on 2.6.24.x but thats even getting
awful long in the tooth at this point.  I've been meaning to try the
last copy of the SKAS4 patch against 2.6.26.x but haven't found the
time yet to wade through the flock of rejects which I would expect.

With all the renames in the impending 2.6.27 tree I'm afraid the
prospects are even worse.  The time seems ripe to push it towards
mainline.


Thanks again for all your efforts on UML.

Have a good weekend.

}-- End of excerpt from Jeff Dike

As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein, Ph.D.   Enjellic Systems Development, LLC.
4206 N. 19th Ave.           Specializing in information infra-structure
Fargo, ND  58102            development.
PH: 701-281-1686
FAX: 701-281-3949           EMAIL: greg@enjellic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Atilla The Hun's Maxim: If you're going to rape, pillage and burn, be sure
 to do things in that order."
                                -- P.J. Plauger
                                   Programming On Purpose
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Is SKAS still required for UML, greg, (Fri Sep 5, 6:36 am)