Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Don Zickus
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008 - 2:24 pm

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 05:21:34PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:

Prarit's patch disabled the timer upon registering a callback to prevent
this case.  The thought was if you have your own handler you could provide
your own watchdog.

Cheers,
Don
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Prarit Bhargava, (Thu Sep 4, 6:07 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Sep 4, 6:37 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Prarit Bhargava, (Thu Sep 4, 7:29 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Sep 4, 8:12 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Vivek Goyal, (Thu Sep 4, 12:08 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 1:01 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 1:21 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 2:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Don Zickus, (Thu Sep 4, 2:24 pm)