Re: [PATCH] x86: order functions in cpu/common.c and cpu/common_64.c

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008 - 12:41 pm

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:


ah, that's _another_ -tip testbox that broke at the same time, with a 
different kernel image. The RIP that corresponds to this box is 
0xffffffff80420470:

ffffffff8042045b <strnlen>:
ffffffff8042045b:       55                      push   %rbp

ffffffff80420470:       80 38 00                cmpb   $0x0,(%rax)


which could be consistent with the printk messup ...


i've double checked that 06e44f6af324 is applied. I'll bisect this.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: order functions in cpu/common.c and cpu/c ..., Ingo Molnar, (Thu Sep 4, 12:41 pm)