Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008 - 11:47 am

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:26:37PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:

They will produce NMIs when the suitable error conditions are true.
That is why the fallback is assuming a chipset problem.

So the only reliable way to find out if the event really came from
the misdesigned watchdog (whoever designed it didn't understand
NMIs I would say) you have to check the chipset (and all other
sources). Hopefully they are all better designed and can
actually tell you if they triggered or not.

Also there's the issue that sometimes people want
the fallback to be the NMI button.


Then why tell the OS? It should be an SMI then.


-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Prarit Bhargava, (Thu Sep 4, 6:07 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Sep 4, 6:37 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Prarit Bhargava, (Thu Sep 4, 7:29 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Sep 4, 8:12 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Andi Kleen, (Thu Sep 4, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Vivek Goyal, (Thu Sep 4, 12:08 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 1:01 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 1:21 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 2:05 pm)