On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:58:18 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

quoted text
> > > BTW, there are two regression fixes for forcedeth:
> > > 
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121917167232014&w=4
> > > 
> > > that fix the regressions tracked as:
> > > 
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11361
> > > 
> > > respectively and both are more than 2 weeks old now.
> > > 
> > > Is there any chance to push them upstream or is there anything wrong with them?
> > 
> > Your patch is fine.  Since DaveM and I are gone this weekend, feel free 
> > to add "acked-by: jgarzik@redhat" and forward upstream to Linus and Andrew.
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
> Andrew, this patch is currently in -mm as forcedeth-fix-kexec-regression.patch
> Could you please add the Jeff's ACK to it and push it to Linus?

yup, thanks.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/