Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Don Zickus
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008 - 10:20 am

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 05:52:17PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

The thing with HP's special watchdog timer is that it does _not_ have a
chipset specific NMI it is trying to catch.  HP is going on the assumption
that _all_ NMIs are /bad/ and they want to catch _every_ NMI, log it, and
reboot the system.

Now obviously NMIs from kgdb and oprofile are not the ones a system should
panic on but this breaks HP's assumptions.

So that is part of the problem.  How do you become a catch-all for NMIs in
a system, to process as you wish, but ignore all the 'safe' NMIs?

Cheers,
Don
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Prarit Bhargava, (Thu Sep 4, 6:07 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Sep 4, 6:37 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Prarit Bhargava, (Thu Sep 4, 7:29 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Sep 4, 8:12 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Don Zickus, (Thu Sep 4, 10:20 am)
Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Vivek Goyal, (Thu Sep 4, 12:08 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 1:01 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 1:21 pm)
RE: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback, Mingarelli, Thomas, (Thu Sep 4, 2:05 pm)