Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: VPD access timeout increase

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008 - 7:19 am

Matthew Wilcox wrote:
[...]

This is fine for the sysfs case, but not if this is called during device
probe - we don't want signals to modprobe to break device initialisation,
do we?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/3] pci: VPD access timeout increase, Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Sep 3, 3:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: VPD access timeout increase, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Sep 4, 5:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: VPD access timeout increase, Ben Hutchings, (Thu Sep 4, 7:19 am)
[PATCH] Return value from schedule(), Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Sep 4, 9:07 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: VPD access timeout increase, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Sep 4, 9:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] Return value from schedule(), Ingo Molnar, (Thu Sep 4, 9:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] Return value from schedule(), Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Sep 4, 9:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: VPD access timeout increase, Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Sep 4, 9:32 am)
Re: [PATCH] Return value from schedule(), Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Sep 4, 10:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] Return value from schedule(), Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Sep 4, 10:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] Return value from schedule(), Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Sep 4, 12:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Return value from schedule(), Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 5, 12:40 am)