On Tuesday 30 September 2008 12:01:38 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text
> 
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > In contrast, the PnP fixup thing is called from pnp_fixup_device, called 
> > from __pnp_add_device(), called from pnp_add_device() (and 
> > pnp_add_card(), but that should be later), and those in turn from
> > pnpacpi_add_device and pnpacpi_init(). 
> > 
> > And pnpacpi_init is _also_ a subsys_initcall [...]
> 
> Btw, why is that? We very much have a separate
> 
> 	/**
> 	 * Reserve motherboard resources after PCI claim BARs,
> 	 * but before PCI assign resources for uninitialized PCI devices
> 	 */
> 	fs_initcall(pnp_system_init);
> 
> which is called much later. That seems to be the _right_ point for any 
> quirks. It seems that the _real_ problem here is that the PnP device fixup 
> is simply called from the wrong point. Ie, why do we do device discovery - 
> and thus PnP quirks - in pnp_init (before the PCI bus is actually fully 
> initialized!), rather than in pnp_system_init?

Right.  The point of this quirk (quirk_system_pci_resources()) is to
prevent the PNP system driver from claiming resources that are actually
used by PCI.  So I don't think there's any reason to run it before we
bind the driver to the device.  PNP doesn't currently have any early/
late concept for quirks, but we probably should add one.

Feels like a post-2.6.27 project though.

Bjorn


--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/