Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » September » 30

kernel.org missing .1 incremental patches

Previous thread: [patch 2/3] timer_list: print cpu number of clockevents device by Thomas Gleixner on Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 11:44 am. (1 message)

Next thread: wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h by Nicolas Pitre on Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 12:35 pm. (10 messages)
[view original message]
From: Andrew Lyon
Subject: kernel.org missing .1 incremental patches
Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 11:51 am

Hi,

The incremental patches at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/incr/ seem to be missing
all .1 patches, for example there are patches to take 2.6.25 from
EXTRAVERSION = .2 to .17 but no patch for .0 > .1, attempting to apply
patch-2.6.25.1-2 to 2.6.25 will fail on the Makefile as it does not
have the correct starting version.

I assume the patches are generated from a script and there is a bug,
easily worked around by downloading the full 2.6.25.1 tarball but the
full incremental set would be very useful for a project I am working
on.

Thanks
Andy
--


[ message continues ]
[view original message]
From: Rabin Vincent
Subject: Re: kernel.org missing .1 incremental patches
Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 12:17 pm

There are no incremental patches for .0 -> .1 in incr because those
would be the same as the patch-2.6.xy.1.bz2 patches available at
pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/.

Rabin
--


[ message continues ]
[view original message]
From: Andrew Lyon
Subject: Re: kernel.org missing .1 incremental patches
Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 12:23 pm

Sorry, I should really have figured that out!

Andy
--


[ message continues ]
Previous thread: [patch 2/3] timer_list: print cpu number of clockevents device by Thomas Gleixner on Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 11:44 am. (1 message)

Next thread: wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h by Nicolas Pitre on Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 12:35 pm. (10 messages)