On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:Side note: unlike the more radical "move all arch driver initcalls earlier", this one actually works for me. But it does cause pnp_system_init() to actually run before pnpacpi_init and pnpbios_init, due to the link order within PnP. That seems ok, since the system/acpi/pnp drivers should all be just different versions of PnP drivers, but I thought I'd mention it. Maybe there is some PnP internal reason why pnp_system_init should run after the pnp_acpi/bios_init functions. (And if so, then just changing the order in drivers/pnp/Makefile would fix it up again). Bjorn, is there any reason why this isn't the right thign to do? Rene - I have this suspicion that just doing this part should already fix your issues with _no_ other patch, since now anything PnP does is after all the PCI setup code anyway. So does your sound card (or whatever it was) work by just doing the subsys_initcall -> fs_initcall change in PnP? Linus --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Greg KH | [patch 00/73] 2.6.23-stable review |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
