Yeah, we can do that. I need to amend the patch a bit to prevent the protected range lock from being lifted unintentionally and will add some debug statements if/when any write/erase cycles fail. -----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@suse.cz] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:41 AM To: Brandeburg, Jesse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org; kkeil@suse.de; agospoda@redhat.com; arjan@linux.intel.com; Graham, David; Allan, Bruce W; Ronciak, John; Thomas Gleixner; chris.jones@canonical.com; tim.gardner@intel.com; airlied@gmail.com; Allan, Bruce W Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to prevent malicious write/erase On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:I guess there is no chance to have kernel somehow notified when write/erase cycle is unsuccessfully tried, is it? This way, it would also make chasing the root cause easier. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs --
| Jeremy Allison | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Joerg Roedel | [PATCH 03/34] AMD IOMMU: add defines and structures for ACPI scanning code |
| Eric W. Biederman | [PATCH] powerpc pseries eeh: Convert to kthread API |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
