Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: split out dumpstack code from traps_xx.c

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 4:27 am

* Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> wrote:


they are not intrusive at all! The right way to do such things is to 
keep them in reasonably small files.


would be nice to bring dumpstack_32.c and dumpstack_64.c together as 
well. While some of the details like IST stack logic (which dont exist 
on 32-bit) are special, most of the glue, the iterators, the boot 
parameters, and even the output should be unified some more.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/2] x86: split out dumpstack code from traps_xx.c, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Sep 30, 4:12 am)
[PATCH 1/2] i386: split out dumpstack code from traps_32.c, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Sep 30, 4:12 am)
[PATCH 2/2] x86_64: split out dumpstack code from traps_64.c, Alexander van Heukelum, (Tue Sep 30, 4:12 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: split out dumpstack code from traps_xx.c, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Sep 30, 4:27 am)