Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct - v3

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 12:28 am

On Thursday 25 September 2008 01:53, Venki Pallipadi wrote:


I'd rather we didn't add any more uses of PageReserved without a
really good reason.

At this point in time (or at least last time I looked, a year or
two ago), it isn't a whole lot of work to remove PG_reserved
completely. If the waters get muddied up again, it could require
another significant rework to remove it in future...

Thanks,
Nick
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Venkatesh Pallipadi, (Fri Sep 12, 5:00 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Sep 13, 10:03 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Sep 14, 7:18 am)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Venki Pallipadi, (Tue Sep 23, 2:46 pm)
RE: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Tue Sep 23, 2:48 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 23, 2:59 pm)
Re: [patch 1/2] x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct - v3, Nick Piggin, (Tue Sep 30, 12:28 am)