Re: [PATCH] markers: let marker_debug as module parameter

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 3:15 am

* Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:


hm, in tip/master we already have ftrace_printk(), which allows such 
debug output to any of the active tracers. That is a far more useful way 
of debugging such things. See:

  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

and:

  http://redhat.com/~mingo/sched-devel.git/readme-tracer.txt

note how much cleaner and more usable it will also become: no silly 
module flags or recompilation to activate this debug output, and no 
debug clutter in the syslog.

if you enable tracing in the 'nop' tracer then only the 
ftrace_printk()'s will be printed, no other trace entries.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] markers: let marker_debug as module parameter, Lai Jiangshan, (Mon Sep 29, 11:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] markers: let marker_debug as module parameter, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Sep 30, 3:15 am)
Re: [PATCH] markers: let marker_debug as module parameter, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Sep 29, 11:41 pm)