On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The hardware has a lock bit, and we're trying to figure out why the BIOS
writers guide doesn't say to set it. Probably because of the MAC address,
but who knows.
> I'm hoping Intel doesn't treat this as just a software bug. Some hw
We will post a patch to e1000e tomorrow that sets a lock bit that prevents
the registers memory mapped by 0:19.0 BAR1 from causing flash write
cycles.
The patches I've just posted don't quite do that yet.
--
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Ingo Molnar | iwlwifi: fix build bug in "iwlwifi: fix LED stall" |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
