[RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jesse Brandeburg
Date: Monday, September 29, 2008 - 8:19 pm

From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>


Here's a patch that adds range checking to the sysfs mappings at
least.  This patch should catch the case where X (or some other
process) tries to map beyond the specific BAR it's (supposedly)
trying to access, making things safer in general.  FWIW both my
F9 and development versions of X start up fine with this patch
applied.

DaveM, will this work for you on sparc?  It looked like your code
was allowing bridge window mappings, but that behavior should be
preserved as long as your bridge devices reflect their window
sizes correctly in their pdev->resources?

If we add similar code to the procfs stuff we wouldn't need to do
any checking in the arches.

Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
---

 drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
index 9c71858..4d1aa6e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 
 
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/stat.h>
 #include <linux/topology.h>
@@ -502,6 +503,8 @@ pci_mmap_resource(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr,
 	struct resource *res = (struct resource *)attr->private;
 	enum pci_mmap_state mmap_type;
 	resource_size_t start, end;
+	unsigned long map_len = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
+	unsigned long map_offset = vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PCI_ROM_RESOURCE; i++)
@@ -510,6 +513,17 @@ pci_mmap_resource(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr,
 	if (i >= PCI_ROM_RESOURCE)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	/*
+	 * Make sure the range the user is trying to map falls within
+	 * the resource
+	 */
+	if (map_offset + map_len > pci_resource_len(pdev, i)) {
+		WARN(1, "process \"%s\" tried to map 0x%08lx-0x%08lx on BAR %d (size 0x%08lx)\n",
+		     current->comm, map_offset, map_offset + map_len, i,
+		     (unsigned long)pci_resource_len(pdev, i));
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	/* pci_mmap_page_range() expects the same kind of entry as coming
 	 * from /proc/bus/pci/ which is a "user visible" value. If this is
 	 * different from the resource itself, arch will do necessary fixup.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC PATCH 00/12] e1000e debug and protection patches, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 01/12] x86: export set_memory_ro and set_memory_rw, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 05/12] e1000e: fix lockdep issues, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 06/12] e1000e: drop stats lock, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 08/12] e1000e: allow bad checksum, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 09/12] e1000e: dump eeprom to dmesg for ich8/9, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:20 pm)
[RFC PATCH 12/12] update version, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:20 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 08/12] e1000e: allow bad checksum, Jiri Kosina, (Tue Sep 30, 1:38 am)
RE: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Oct 2, 9:27 am)
RE: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Oct 2, 11:02 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Oct 2, 11:58 am)
[PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Oct 2, 4:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM, Jesse Brandeburg, (Thu Oct 2, 5:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Oct 2, 5:28 pm)