Linus Torvalds wrote:my current status mail was posted earlier today to lkml from this address, since then we've had a local reproduction and are going for number two. The reproduction seems racy, i.e. it doesn't happen every time, so we put it in a loop doing detect, check eeprom, detect, etc, and we'll see if it fails. Reproduction seems to consistently be around X probing time, no firm leads yet. As for Intel we have keithp and jbarnes as well as arjan, auke, myself and a few others involved. We have some patches to lock the nvm down, we'll be posting those tonight and tomorrow, I also have some debug logic (and fixes) to help prove that we don't think it's a race in e1000e. -- Jesse --
| Jeff Garzik | [PATCH 1/9] irq-remove: core |
| Jamie Lokier | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Dave Young | Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? |
git: | |
| Dan Miner | Compilation speeds (was Re: No patchlevel 3.} |
| Ian Jackson | RFD: comp.os.linux split |
| X X | X11 GIf viewer somewhere? |
| root | Broken pipe when using reboot/halt, etc. |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
