On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote:Are you sure? There was a mandriva report abou NVM corruption on an e100 too (that one apparently just caused PXE failure, the networking worked fine). So I wonder if it's _purely_ X-server-related, adn the reason people blame 2.6.27-rc1 is just timing of some X update and then people just look at the kernel beceuse the 'network card failed' looks so kernel-related. The reason I mention that is right now it looks like the distros are just running around disabling the e1000e module, or perhaps downgrading it. Which may not even work! The discussions in some of the bug-trackers seem to be full of people who have no actual information, but are perfectly willing to flail around wildly saying obviously crazy things. The Ubuntu people are some of the crazier ones (should I be surprised?), but that one also has Ben Collins claiming they use the same e1000e driver for the 2.6.26/27 kernels (from intels sf.net project). That may be bogus, but if true it would indicate that it's possibly not so kernel-related, or at least not so e1000e-driver-related. Linus --
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [RFC PATCH 06/26] UBIFS: add superblock and master node |
| Joe Perches | [PATCH 001/148] include/asm-x86/acpi.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting only |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Christoph Lameter | Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
