Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, avi@redhat.com <avi@...>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...>, Zach Amsden <zach@...>, Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...>, Jun.Nakajima@Intel.Com <Jun.Nakajima@...>
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:46 -0700, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Gerd,
I really fail to see your point here. Maybe you can point out what am i
missing.
Think about the current situation, whenever there is migration to such a
tsc-is-different system , how does the guest come to know about the
frequency change, either through a $event or if it reboots it runs the
calibration algorithm.
How does asking the hypervisor for tsc instead of calibrating it, breaks
the semantics for this migration.
What special things does Xen do at migration, which would be affected by
this interface ?
Yep i will document this in my next post.
Thanks,
Alok
--