Re: regarding major number of block extended devt

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - 9:12 am

Tejun Heo wrote:

But just allocating a big bucket of device numbers and throw it all into 
a pot semirandomly is likely to cause more damage, not less.

	-hpa
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
regarding major number of block extended devt, Tejun Heo, (Tue Sep 2, 5:26 am)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, Tejun Heo, (Tue Sep 2, 5:35 am)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Sep 2, 1:16 pm)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, Tejun Heo, (Tue Sep 2, 9:13 pm)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Sep 3, 9:12 am)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, Tejun Heo, (Wed Sep 3, 9:21 am)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Sep 3, 9:27 am)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, Tejun Heo, (Wed Sep 3, 9:45 am)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Sep 3, 9:57 am)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Sep 3, 11:11 am)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, Tejun Heo, (Wed Sep 3, 5:25 pm)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Sep 3, 5:28 pm)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, Tejun Heo, (Wed Sep 3, 5:35 pm)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Sep 3, 5:43 pm)
Re: regarding major number of block extended devt, Jens Axboe, (Thu Sep 4, 4:50 am)