[ANNOUNCE]: ConfigFS enabled Generic Target Mode and iSCSI Target Stack on v2.6.27-rc7

Previous thread: [PATCH] x86: IOMMU setup failures should not be KERN_ERR by Adam Jackson on Monday, September 29, 2008 - 11:52 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: [patch 4/4] cpu alloc: Use cpu allocator instead of the builtin modules per cpu allocator by Christoph Lameter on Monday, September 29, 2008 - 12:35 pm. (2 messages)
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Monday, September 29, 2008 - 12:21 pm

Greetings all,

I am happy to announce that the first ConfigFS configurable generic
target engine (target_core_mod) and iSCSI Target Stack
(iscsi_target_mod) are now able to use ConfigFS symlinks for the
creation of Linux Storage Objects from drivers/scsi, block, or fs/
storage objects to iSCSI Target Port Endpoints.

The code is available currently running on v2.6.27-rc7 and has been
broken up into a number of commits at:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=summary

Now that the primary configfs functionality is up and allowing iSCSI
Initiator Traffic to the symlinked storage objects from a generic target
engine, I will be continuing work on the complete logic for configfs
enabled iscsi_target_mod, as well as removing the legacy IOCTL control
path as equivalent functionality is added with ConfigFS.  

Also, one of the next major steps for the upstream generic target engine
and iSCSI target stack is to include SCST's target mode API between
Engine / Fabric to give target_core_mod a proper Fabric API to allow
other SCST fabric modules to access target_core_mod's configfs enabled
storage objects.  Also, allowing STGT to use the configfs interface to
allow for userspace fabrics to the same target_core_mod storage objects
is also on the list, but I imagine interest from those communities will
certainly help drive those efforts.  

Here are the shell variables required to make it all go:

export CONFIGFS=/sys/kernel/config/
export TARGET=/sys/kernel/config/target/core/
export FABRIC=/sys/kernel/config/target/iscsi/

The storage objects registered with target_core_mod via $TARGET may be
mapped from $TARGET/$HBA/$STORAGE_OBJECT any number of times to:

$FABRIC/$IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_0/$PORT_LINK
$FABRIC/$IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_1/$PORT_LINK
$FABRIC/$IQN/tpgt_2/lun/lun_0/$PORT_LINK
$FABRIC/$ANOTHER_IQN/tpgt_1/lun_0/$PORT_LINK
....
....

Here are the shell commands to bring storage objects online..

# Create a IBLOCK HBA and virtual storage ...
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 10:36 am

Hi Nicholas,


It's good, I like it. The only thing concerns me that, considering how 
much time *I* spent to understand it, for an average user understanding 
it can be an unbearable nightmare ;)

In a few days I'll write a proposed configfs hierarchy for existing SCST 
/proc interface.

Vlad

--

From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 5:24 pm

Well, the idea is not necessarily making the configfs interface the
easiest to use in the world by user directly through $CONFIGFS, but to
make the CLI scripts that speak $CONFIGFS/target CLI, and of course the
actual UIs for user that interact with generic target core and
$FABRIC_MODs be as simple and elegent as possible.  

That is what I believe the balance that a configfs enabled generic
target core provides to both the $CONFIGFS/target API and to $FABRIC_MOD
maintainers looking to port their code to use a generic control

Sounds good!  Please let me know if you have questions.


--

From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 10:00 am

There's one unsolved problem. As I've already written, SCST core needs 
an ability to provide to user space a large amount of data, which may 
not fit to a single page. A list of connected initiators ("sessions" 
file in /proc), for instance. Each initiator in that list has a number 
of attributes: initiator name, target template name, count of 
outstanding commands, etc. The logical way for that would be to create a 
subdirectory for each initiator, like:

/sys/kernel/config/
`-- target
     `-- sessions
         `-- session1
         |   |-- initiator_name
         |   |-- template_name
         |   `-- commands
         |
         `-- session2
             |-- initiator_name
             `-- template_name
             `-- commands

But looks like configfs requires each subdirectory to be created 
manually by user via, e.g., mkdir command. It would be really strange if 
we require user to manually create "sessions" subdirectory to be able to 
see a list of connected initiators. Do I miss anything?

Vlad
--

From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 2:29 pm

The the Initiator Port ACLs need to go
under /sys/kernel/config/target/$FABRIC because the struct fabric_acl *
will always contain fabric dependent config items.  For example, Since
these struct fabric_acl_t do *NOT* symlink directly back to
target_core_mod under /sys/kernel/config/target/core/$HBA/$DEV, but to
fabric_lun_t (iscsi_lun_t in my case) to Symlink to
a /sys/kernel/config/target/core/$HBA/$DEV that has been registered with
the generic target configfs infrastructure.

Here is what I am thinking wrt /sys/kernel/config/target/iscsi and iSCSI
Initiator Node ACLs to iSCSI Portal Groups and iSCSI LUNs attached to
those Portal Groups.  There are two cases:

*) The production case with with user creating those ACLs under $FABRIC
(which is what I will focus on now).

* And "Demo Mode" case where any Initiator logging into
$FABRIC/$ENDPOINT/$PORTAL can have access to all
$FABRIC/$ENDPOINT/lun/lun_*/*my_ports*

The production ACL case would look like:

export CONFIGFS=/sys/kernel/config/
export TARGET=/sys/kernel/config/target/core/
export FABRIC=/sys/kernel/config/target/iscsi/

TARGET_IQN=iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.ps3-cell.ppc64:sn.f8f651bd5fec
INITIATOR_IQN=iqn.1993-08.org.debian:01.f82074ca555f

<Setup $STORAGE_OBJECTs under $TARGET>

# Create the LIO-target endpoint
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$TARGET_IQN/tpgt_1/np/172.16.201.137:3260"
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$TARGET_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_0"

<Setup Port Symlinks from $TARGET to $TARGET_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_0>

# Create the Initiator ACL under $TARGET_IQN/tpgt_1
mkdir -p $"FABRIC/$TARGET_IQN/tpgt_1/initiators/$INITIATOR_IQN"
# Allow $INITIATOR_IQN access to tpgt_1/lun/lun_0/
ln -s "$FABRIC/$TARGET_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_0" \
can simply use use:

cat $FABRIC/iqn*/tpgt*/initiators/*/session

to see which acl'ed iSCSI Initiators are logged in on all iSCSI Target
Ports.

Also I should add that I am currently using /proc/scsi_target/mib
and /proc/iscsi_target_mib for READ-ONLY data with target_core_mod.ko
and iscsi_target_mod.ko ...
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Friday, October 3, 2008 - 4:14 pm

Ok, here is the commit diff for adding Initiator ACLS to
iscsi/$IQN/$TPGT/ under the acls/ subdirectory (instead of "initiators"
in the example above).

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=0a451aff...

Other than the name change, everything is functioning in the commit as
described in the example above.  I am able to successfully mkdir(2) and
rmdir(2) iscsi/$IQN/$TPGT/acls/$INITIATOR_IQN, as well as create the
SymLinks from iscsi/$IQN/$TPGT/lun/lun_* to
iscsi/$IQN/$TPGT/acls/$INITIATOR_IQN/lun_* to create the Initiator TPGT
LUN Mappings.

There are a couple of remaining items that I am still working on WRT the
Initiator ACL code.  One is that the CmdSN Queue Depth for the Initiator
is hardcoded.  This needs to be a configfs attribute under
iscsi/$IQN/$TPGT/acls/$INITIATOR_NAME/, and then enabled with a
attribute under the same $INITIATOR_NAME directory.  Another is
assigning READ-ONLY (its hardcoded to R/W for now) access to one of the
initiator's TPG LUN mappings.  I was thinking name in the TPG LUN
Symlink destination name, we could include "lun_0:RO" in order to make
this Initiator's LUN be READ-ONLY.

Anyways, this are pretty minor and I should be commiting the remaining
pieces over the weekend.

--nab

--

From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 - 2:56 am

Sorry for the delay. I didn't have a chance to look at it sufficiently 
close.

Basically the idea about how to manage ACLs is good, but I don't like, 
that with it *ALL* the target drivers would have to implement the 
necessary code. It shouldn't be so, management of all security stuff 
should be purely duty of the mid-layer. And this is exactly implemented 
in SCST. All what target drivers should do with it is to pass target's 
name on its registration in scst_register() and then while registering a 
session with remote initiator using scst_register_session() pass to it 
the initiator's name. Everything else is done by the SCST core.

Thus, I believe, all the ACL management should be done not in $FABRIC/, 
but in $TARGET/. It would remove all the corresponding configfs 
headaches from the target drivers writers.

But, in fact, I asked about completely different thing. SCSI target 
mid-layer in some cases needs to export in user space amount of data, 
which doesn't fit one page. /proc/scsi_tgt/sessions is one example. What 

--

From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 - 1:50 pm

By the "mid-layer" I assume you mean the generic target mode engine, and
not the SCSI mid layer, yes..?

Point taken however that $TARGET_MOD could, and probably should have
some manner of generic ACL infrastructure available through FABRIC <->
TARGET API.  I will have a look at scst_register() and
scst_register_session() and see where it should be adapted to
target_core_mod.

Btw, saying that "management of all security stuff should be purely duty
of the mid-layer" is incorrect however.  The generic target engine needs
to make it *EASIER* for $FABRIC to allow those initiator ports access to
Mapped LUNs through fabric *DEPENDENT* endpoints, but trying to put all
fabric depepdent ACL endpoint logic in target_core_mod is IMHO a bad
idea.  

Since each SCSI fabric's method of attaching SCSI LUN to Initiator Port
Endpoints in $FABRIC_MOD to SCSI Device (I have been calling
this /sys/kernel/config/target/core/$STORAGE_OBJECT for target_core_mod)
to create the SCSI Target Port is different.  The reference I use for
iscsi_target_mod (and hence wrt target_core_mod) is proper T10/SCSI
terminlogy AFAIK.  Lets reference the objects in
http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com/satran/ips/EddyQuicksall-iSCSI-in-diagrams/portal_groups.pdf 
for the discussion so we can make sure we are on the same page..

For example, just because iSCSI uses TargetName + TargetPortalGroupTag
to attach target_core_mod's $STORAGE_OBJECTs at iSCSI Logical Units to,
does not mean that SAS, or another SCSI based target fabric know
anything about TargetName or TargetPortalGroupTag.  In iSCSI, this is
defined in Section 2.1: 

     The I_T nexus can be identified by the conjunction of the SCSI port
     names; that is, the I_T nexus identifier is the tuple (iSCSI
     Initiator Name + ',i,'+ ISID, iSCSI Target Name + ',t,'+ Portal 
     Group Tag).

Obviously the Initiator and Target Ports wrt iSCSI fabric are more
"symbolic" than devices attached to say a legacy Parallel SCSI bus
because of IP storage having multiple IP ...
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 - 12:22 am

On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 17:01 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:


Ok, here is the commit:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d1dc1c1da837...

In the example I am using two iSCSI Initiators (one Debian and one
OpenSuse) that both have TPG LUN 0 and 1 mapped to their Initiator LUN 0
and 1 under $FABRIC/$IQN/tpgt_1.

Here is what it looks like from the CLI:

export TARGET=/sys/kernel/config/target/core/
export FABRIC=/sys/kernel/config/target/iscsi/

<Setup target_core_mod storage objects..>

DEF_IQN="iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.target.i686:sn.e475ed6fcdd0"

# The first mkdir(2) to $FABRIC will load iscsi_target_mod
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/np/172.16.201.137:3260"
# Create TPG LUN 0 and symlink $STORAGE_OBJECT from target_core_mod
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_0"
ln -s $TARGET/iblock_0/lvm_test0 "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_0/lio_west_port"
# Create TPG LUN 1 and symlink $STORAGE_OBJECT from target_core_mod
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_1"
ln -s $TARGET/pscsi_0/sdd "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_1/lio_east_port"

INITIATOR_DEBIAN="iqn.1993-08.org.debian:01:2dadf92d0ef"

# Create Node and two LUN ACL Symlinks for Debian Initiator
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/acls/$INITIATOR_DEBIAN/lun_0"
ln -s "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_0" "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/acls/$INITIATOR_DEBIAN/lun_0/."
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/acls/$INITIATOR_DEBIAN/lun_1"
ln -s "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_1" "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/acls/$INITIATOR_DEBIAN/lun_1/."

INITIATOR_SUSE="iqn.1996-04.de.suse:01:1661f9ee7b5"

# Create Node and two LUN ACL Symlinks for Suse Initiator
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/acls/$INITIATOR_SUSE/lun_0"
ln -s "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_0" "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/acls/$INITIATOR_SUSE/lun_0/."
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/acls/$INITIATOR_SUSE/lun_1"
ln -s "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/lun/lun_1" ...
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Date: Friday, October 10, 2008 - 10:49 am

Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:

I don't like that limitation. It looks completely artificial for me. And 
this approach doesn't address what to do if there is a connection from 
initiator, for which there is no corresponding ACL entry.

I again strongly suggest you to get familiar with SCST access control 
approach before making the next move. It's proved to be good and we 

--

From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Date: Friday, October 10, 2008 - 10:48 am

Nicholas, you think too iSCSI centric. From access control POV only 2 
thing matter:

1. Target name - to assign to it a default access control group (ACL, if 
you like that name), i.e. an ACL for initiators not listed in other ACLs

2. Initiator name - to assign it to the corresponding ACL.

It doesn't matter if those names are IQNs for iSCSI or WWNs for FC, or 
bus:id:lun for parallel SCSI.

For example, consider target "TTT", which has 2 ACLs: "Default" with 
Device1 as LUN 0 and "Group1" with "Device2" as LUN 0. "Group1" 
specified for initiator "III1". Then when initiator "III1" connected to 
target "TTT", it would be assigned to "Group1" and see "Device2". If 
then initiator "III2" connected, it would be assigned to "Default" ACL 
and see "Device1". "Default" group can be empty, if necessary. There's 
nothing transport specific in this approach at all.

I strongly suggest you to look at SCST access control approach and make 
sure you understand it before reply. It would save us a lot of time and 
effort. Note, this approach isn't something theoretical. It's proved by 
4 years of successful usage.

Also, it would be good, if you shift your terminology to be less iSCSI 
specific and use the corresponding terms from SAM, where possible. We 
are discussing a config interface for a generic target engine, aren't 
we? Otherwise sometimes it's quite hard for me to understand you and I 
have strong suspicions that other people are getting or already got lost 


Hmm, I looked at the code and in lio_target_initiator_nacl_info() saw 
something like:

		rb += sprintf(page+rb, "LIO Session ID: %u   "
			"ISID: 0x%02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x  "
			"TSIH: %hu  ", sess->sid,
			sess->isid[0], sess->isid[1], sess->isid[2],
			sess->isid[3], sess->isid[4], sess->isid[5],
			sess->tsih);
		rb += sprintf(page+rb, "SessionType: %s\n",
				(SESS_OPS(sess)->SessionType) ?
				"Discovery" : "Normal");
		rb += sprintf(page+rb, "Cmds in Session Pool: %d  ...
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Friday, October 10, 2008 - 1:41 pm

Not true.  Thre is *NOTHING* in target_core_mod's configfs layout that
is "iSCSI centric", or $FABRIC centric at all.  We are talking about
configfs symbolic links with /bin/ls from target_core_mod storage
objects and $FABRIC_MOD portal group ports for $FABRIC LUNs.  How
Initiators logging into those $FABRIC_MOD endpoints (Node ACLs) and
accessing those $FABRIC LUNs (LUN ACLs) is still $FABRIC dependent.  

There is nothing iSCSI, SCSI, ATA or NBD centric about it, it is UNIX
centric and works generically across any fabric, that is the whole point
of having target_core_mod.  Why would we want to limit the generic

Wrong.  For iSCSI, Section 2.1 of RFC-3720 defines it as TargetName +
TargetPortalGroupTag, and this is the method that all of my upstream
work and any proper implemention of target node endpoint and target

Your example limits all iSCSI ACLs to TargetName, instead of TargetName
+TargetPortalGroupTag.

That is why everything related to iscsi_target_mod operation is
below /sys/kernel/config/target/iscsi/$IQN/$TPGT and
not /sys/kernel/config/target/iscsi/$IQN.  

Obviously I am not going to limit my upstream iscsi_target_mod to an ACL
structure that does not take into account a complete RFC-3720
implementation, but I would be more than happy to see you update your
ACL code to reflect proper TargetName+TargetPortalGroupTag that RFC-3720

I don't really care about history, I care about code.  Why don't you
start breaking out which code you want to go upstream so that it makes
my job easier or start integrating your own ACL control model into
drivers/lio-core/target_core_configfs.c and post a patch and then we can
discuss!

In all honesty however, the ACL code is a small nit-pick compared to how
we are going to merge your $FABRIC <-> $TARGET API with
drivers/lio-core.  Why don't you start there first while I consider what
can be made generic for ACL code for the target_core_mod configfs

Heh, why do you think I moved my upstream work to ConfigFS..?  Being
able to ...
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - 11:11 am

Sorry, Nicholas, but it's pretty hard to discuss something with you. 
Your complicated manner to express yourself (this isn't a critic, just 
statement of fact, I'm also pretty much not an ideal in this area) 
requires from your interlocutor a lot of effort to simply understand 
you, but I don't feel that you put comparable effort to understand 
what's written to you.

Let's restart our discussion and do it step by step. At first, some of 
terms you use are pretty confusing for me and, I suspect, many other 
people, as well as some terms I use seem confuse you. So, let's start 
from finding a common terminological ground. It will remove future 
misunderstandings and allow people to easier follow us. Below I'll 
propose some terms. I'll tried to make them as close to the regular 
Linux practice as possible, but if I'm not right somewhere everybody is 
welcome to correct me.

1. Let's use term "SCSI transport" instead of "fabric", which you use. 
This is well corresponding to the regular Linux practice as well as to 
SAM. Particularly, SAM doesn't have the word "fabric" anywhere.

2. Target name - an opaque string passed from target driver to SCSI 
target mid-layer. It contains whatever the target driver would like. For 
example, for iSCSI it can be Target Name, or Target Port Name + Target 
Portal Group Tag in string form. For Fibre Channel it can be WWN of the 
corresponding target port. For parallel SCSI it can be target's 
bus:id:lun numbers in string form. SCSI target mid-layer uses it to 
provide access control.

3. Initiator name - an opaque string passed from target driver to SCSI 
target mid-layer. It contains whatever the target driver would like. For 
example, for iSCSI it can be Initiator Name, or Initiator User Name @ 
Initiator Name in string form, like 
joe@iqn.1996-04.de.suse:01:1661f9ee7b5. For Fibre Channel it can be WWN 
of the corresponding initiator port. For parallel SCSI it can be 
initiator's bus:id:lun numbers in string form. SCSI target mid-layer ...
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 5:18 pm

Ok, just added new commits to make target_core_mod be able to run
independently of iscsi_target_mod.  This means that all mkdir(2) calls
under $TARGET do not require iscsi_target_mod to be loaded.

Next, following Joel's advice from LPC, I made
target_core_configfs.c:target_core_register_fabric(),  call
request_module() to load $FABRIC_MOD instead of using
do_configfs_mkdir() to kick off the registration process.  This means
that $FABRIC_MOD's init_module() is responsible for calling
target_fabric_configfs_init() and target_fabric_configfs_register() to
complete $FABRIC_MOD's registration with the configfs generic target
core.  This means that startup now looks like:

modprobe target_core_mod

export CONFIGFS=/sys/kernel/config/
export TARGET=/sys/kernel/config/target/core/
export FABRIC=/sys/kernel/config/target/iscsi/

mkdir -p $TARGET/iblock_0/lvm_test0
echo iblock_major=254,iblock_minor=2 >
$TARGET/iblock_0/lvm_test0/dev_control
echo 1 > $TARGET/iblock_0/lvm_test0/dev_enable

mkdir -p $TARGET/pscsi_0/sdd
echo scsi_channel_id=0,scsi_target_id=3,scsi_lun_id=0 >
$TARGET/pscsi_0/sdd/dev_control
echo 1 > $TARGET/pscsi_0/sdd/dev_enable

DEF_IQN="iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.target.i686:sn.e475ed6fcdd0"

# The first mkdir(2) to $FABRIC will load iscsi_target_mod
mkdir -p "$FABRIC/$DEF_IQN/tpgt_1/np/172.16.201.137:3260"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

<snip>

This line will modprobe iscsi_target_mod, create iscsi_tiqn_t,
iscsi_portal_group_t, and iscsi_tpg_np_t objects with a single mkdir(2)
call.


So at this point, I believe all (or very close to all) iSCSI target
related functions are now outside of target_core_mod.  There are a few
more file and function names that need to have their prefixes changed,
but other that a handful of this minor bits, things are getting close
installing the SCST Target API between $FABRIC_MOD <->
$TARGET_CORE_MOD. 

Also, I was thinking a bit more about how things show up under $TARGET,
which is ...
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 5:32 pm

This last part should be:

".. a special case between ConfigFS <-> SysFS in order to deliver struct
scsi_device and struct block_device via SymLinks to
$TARGET/pscsi_*/$STORAGE_OBJECT and
ln -s $TARGET/$PLUGIN_HBA/$STORAGE_OBJECT
$FABRIC/endpoint/lun/lun_0/lio_west_port



--

Previous thread: [PATCH] x86: IOMMU setup failures should not be KERN_ERR by Adam Jackson on Monday, September 29, 2008 - 11:52 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: [patch 4/4] cpu alloc: Use cpu allocator instead of the builtin modules per cpu allocator by Christoph Lameter on Monday, September 29, 2008 - 12:35 pm. (2 messages)