On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@poczta.fm> wrote:
quoted text
> From: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
>
> The macros setCx86_old() and getCx86_old() do not
> work as a comment says in the processor-cyrix.h.
>
> Use working inline functions instead to enable
> the CPUID instriction on Cyrix cpus.
>
> Tested on IBM 6x86MX cpu with disabled the
> CPUID instruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
> ---
>
> This patch is against the linux-next tree (20080819)
> as it contains the following patch:
>
> x86, cyrix: debug
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=026e2c05ef58ef...
>
> The linux-2.6-tip tree has not the Ingo's patch so it
> does not require my patch.
>
> I am confused. Is the x86 detection code for Cyrix
> cpus is right in the linux-next or in the linux-2.6-tip?
> Should I prepare patches against the linux-2.6-tip
> or linux-next?

linux-2.6-tip.

YH
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/