Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Martin K. Petersen
Date: Monday, September 29, 2008 - 8:05 am

>>>>> "Kiyoshi" == Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> writes:

Kiyoshi> Creating another function (e.g. dm_table_set_integrity(t,
Kiyoshi> md)) may be better, since then you wouldn't need dm_queue()
Kiyoshi> nor need to change the function interface of
Kiyoshi> dm_table_set_restrictions() I think.

You are right.  Originally I had more reasons for having that calling
interface change but that's no longer the case.  I'll fan the
integrity bits out to a separate function.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM, Martin K. Petersen, (Sat Sep 20, 5:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM, Andrew Morton, (Sat Sep 20, 9:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM, Martin K. Petersen, (Tue Sep 23, 11:41 am)
[PATCH 1/2] block: Find bio sector offset given idx and offset, Martin K. Petersen, (Tue Sep 23, 11:41 am)
[PATCH 2/2] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM, Martin K. Petersen, (Tue Sep 23, 11:41 am)
Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm: Add support for data integr ..., Martin K. Petersen, (Mon Sep 29, 8:05 am)